|
Post by boomboom on Mar 22, 2014 18:57:31 GMT -5
As the title says.
A question on the length of dew shields. Mine is 3x the objective diameter which looks great blocks stray light and so far no dew problems. Does the longer dew shield prevent dew forming? My experience so far says yes, but (to my mind) a slightly misinformed person on the Aussie forum IIS, thinks that as his Dob gets dew on the mirror and the 1200mm tube acts as a dew shield, then any length dew shield isn't going to work. Personally I think a dob with an open end tube at the mirror end, and being close to the ground is the difference. I have had my Tube wet with dew but nothing on the objective. Am I correct in thinking that? I have never owned a dob so I can't compare. Any one done a comparison like this? I'm enjoying the freedom of the 1877 Gaunt mount, and the f12 refractor…not an electric cable in sight! Matt
|
|
|
Post by mikey cee on Mar 22, 2014 20:54:38 GMT -5
It's hard to tell really what a dob owner actually sees if anything! You are correct any open trussed dob will get moisture down next to the ground. That's why some use those nylon hose contraptions over the trusswork. That and the dropping of collimation tools constantly being used plus scattered light. Mike
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on Mar 26, 2014 3:20:30 GMT -5
Thanks Mike. Knew I could count on you to give a straight answer My next scope is going to be an 8" f12 R35, now I have a mount that can take it. Matt
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 26, 2014 9:23:37 GMT -5
If you bought a 204-12 R35 TCR the mount would not be as big a concern There is a certain amount of polar moment with an object that long even at lighter weights though. The big issue would be the $1000 (shipping charge) it would take for me to ship it down to you. Mike
|
|
glend
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by glend on Mar 26, 2014 19:36:14 GMT -5
Which is why you should build it boomboom.
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on Mar 27, 2014 4:41:32 GMT -5
If you bought a 204-12 R35 TCR the mount would not be as big a concern There is a certain amount of polar moment with an object that long even at lighter weights though. The big issue would be the $1000 (shipping charge) it would take for me to ship it down to you. Mike Thanks Mike! We have a Prime Minister in this country who when in opposition had a few slogans one of which was …'axe the tax' He was referring to a mining tax, but I think it should be applied too import tax! It will have to be another ATM…when I have a dark sky site to permanently mount it, the wheels are in motion Matt
|
|
|
Post by jimcurry on Mar 27, 2014 5:51:01 GMT -5
Hey Boomboom:
I too build with 3:1 dewshields. Never had an Istar dew up on me even when the OTA was dripping. Looks good, too.
Jim
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on Apr 15, 2014 19:27:24 GMT -5
Had two nights with a very dripping wet OTA. 70mm finder scope lens..fogged up, Istar lens clean and clear. Well that answers that. A 3:1 dew shield works. Now to build a dew shield for the 70mm finder. Matt
|
|
|
Post by kevinbarker on Apr 16, 2014 3:42:32 GMT -5
Had two nights with a very dripping wet OTA. 70mm finder scope lens..fogged up, Istar lens clean and clear. Well that answers that. A 3:1 dew shield works. Now to build a dew shield for the 70mm finder. Matt Matt With the finder try a smaller dewcap of say 1.0 to 1.5 times the objective diameter past the lens. Then wrap around some tinfoil around this dew cap. Obviously so the foil does not reflect light into the optical path. I bet it keeps the dew at bay. It used to work for me in winter dewy conditions in the South island!! Kevin
|
|
|
Post by jimcurry on Apr 16, 2014 13:06:17 GMT -5
Had two nights with a very dripping wet OTA. 70mm finder scope lens..fogged up, Istar lens clean and clear. Well that answers that. A 3:1 dew shield works. Now to build a dew shield for the 70mm finder. Matt Or put the lens cap on the finder between uses :>) Jim
|
|