|
Post by jolasa on Sept 25, 2013 7:20:33 GMT -5
Regarding imaging with my Asteria 150 TCR R35.
As we all know, as a rule of thumb, the guidescope should have about as long a focal length as the telescope you are photographing through.
The Asteria 150 F12 has a focal length of 1800 mm - this means a HUGE guide scope.
For some images I took when I first got the Asteria 150 back in July 2013, I used a 50 mm f3.2 (focal length=162mm) guidescope, and the images were pretty good. This mini guide scope is advertised to work with scopes up to 1500mm focal length.
I also have an 80mm f5 scope (focal length=400mm) I could use. But, to improve things, I am thinking of trying OAG (off-axis guiding) - a small pickoff prism in the main scope light path diverts star images to the guide camera. This would mean the main scope and the guide scope are essentially the same. I am aware of potential problems finding suitable guide stars.
Anybody have experience imaging with the Istar large aperture, high f-ratio scopes?
What quide scope and other equipment do you use?
JonS
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Sept 25, 2013 8:43:57 GMT -5
Hello Jon, I would say the OAG is the best bet in your continued use of a DSLR. Celestron and AP used to make fairly inexpensive guide scopes in small aperture long focal length. I don't see them on their web sites anymore. Most now use OAGs, guide cameras that attach directly to the imaging camera or the camera itself has a separate small chip. The problem with a long focal length guide scope is you really have to have it mounted securely as any flexure between the two scopes will show up in the images. What is the brand name and model number of the OAG pictured?
Mike
|
|
|
Post by jolasa on Sept 25, 2013 12:16:53 GMT -5
|
|